Estimated reading time: 1 minute, 3 seconds

Employee or Independent Contractor? Uber Ruling Reignites Debate

Initial legal challenges to the technology start-up’s business have come from traditional taxi services from New York to Paris to Beijing. Now, however, Uber is facing opposition from within the ranks of its own drivers, who enjoy the flexibility of setting their own hours but must provide and maintain their own vehicles and pay Uber a per-ride fee. So reports the Los Angeles Times.

Uber claims its drivers are independent contractors and therefore not entitled to traditional corporate benefits, while more and more of its drivers say they should be considered employees.

In a recent ruling by the California Labor Commissioner’s office, one San Francisco Uber driver requested reimbursement for mileage and toll expenses to the tune of $4,000 for her three-month stint with the firm; the office ruled in her favor, saying her services were “integral” to Uber’s business and that she was an employee.

Uber is appealing the decision, but in March a federal judge ruled that a similar, class-action lawsuit brought in San Francisco can proceed. Those plaintiff Uber drivers claim they are entitled to benefits like healthcare, unemployment insurance and workmen’s compensation. Potential decisions by high courts against Uber could seriously impact the company’s business model.

Read the full article from the Los Angeles Times.

 

Read 2705 times
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Visit other PMG Sites:

PMG360 is committed to protecting the privacy of the personal data we collect from our subscribers/agents/customers/exhibitors and sponsors. On May 25th, the European's GDPR policy will be enforced. Nothing is changing about your current settings or how your information is processed, however, we have made a few changes. We have updated our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy to make it easier for you to understand what information we collect, how and why we collect it.